Wine Business Monthly's 10th Varietal Focus features Merlot, and the tasting is happening right now! For each Varietal Focus article, contributing writer/winemaker Lance Cutler selects a varietal, picks three regions known for that variety and invites three winemakers from each region to participate in discussing their vineyard and winemaking practices as well as taste and critique each other's wines.
The tasting today is happening at Januik Winery in Woodinville, Washington. The Merlot Varietal Focus features wines from Napa, Washington and the North Fork of Long Island. The winemakers attending the tasting today are all from Washington:
Mike and Andrew Januik - Januik Winery, Kevin Mott - Woodward Canyon Winery and Casey McClellan - Seven Hills Winery. Merlots from each of these Washington wineries are being tasted in addition to: Duckhorn Vineyards, Provenance Vineyards and Burgess Cellars from Napa; Bedell Cellars, Blackbird from Anthony Nappa Wines and Shinn Estate Vineyards from the North Folk of Long Island.
Pictured from left to right: Kevin Mott, Lance Cutler,, Andrew Januik, Mary Jorgensen,
Casey McClellan and Mike Januik
Wine Business Monthly's popular Varietal Focus Series is published twice a year in the January and September issues. The Merlot edition will be published in the January 2015 issue of WBM. Go to the WBM archives page to check out past Varietal Focuses, including, Syrah: (Feb 2011), Pinot Noir: (Sept 2011), Chardonnay: (Jan 2012), Zinfandel: (Sept. 2012), Cabernet Sauvignon: (Jan 2013), Red Blends: (Sept 2013), Riesling: (Jan 2014) and Grenache (coming Sept. 2014). Click here to subscribe to WBM.
Jennifer Wall @BarefootJenWall:
Last night marked the official start of harvest! Sunset harvesting: http://ow.ly/i/6mTWP #champagne #chardonnay #harvest2014
“The dirty little trade secret is that most wineries really only know who 5 percent of their customers [are].”
-Sean Dunn, managing director, Groove
Have you checked out the July 2014 issue of Wine Business Monthly yet? Read the Month in Review below for a preview of what is in the issue:
A Focus on Technology
How much time should your winery allocate to social media? Which platforms should you take the time for? These questions come up all the time and there’s no one-size fits all answer. However, the technology survey in this issue shows what social media platforms wineries are on in general and how often they update their various social media accounts.
Some of the results aren’t too surprising. Facebook is used nearly universally, while other platforms such as Pinterest and Instagram are being used by relatively few wineries so far. Only 8 percent of wineries don’t have a Facebook while 35 percent aren’t on Twitter.
Of those using Facebook and/or Twitter, 82 percent say they respond to customer comments and concerns on those platforms within 48 hours of the original comment. Wineries have that figured out. I was a little surprised to learn that wineries aren’t blogging that much.
Many wineries—more than half—are designing their websites specifically for mobile. Wineries are on it but the survey shows most don’t track where their website traffic is coming from. There’s room for improvement.
Wineries aren’t just using digital technology to reach consumers for marketing, branding and direct sales: An article in this month’s issue covers how some are using it to create educational sales tools specifically for distributors as well as on- and off-premise accounts. That’s because of the flexibility mobile devices offer and because the cost of creating these tools is becoming more affordable.
Over the years, WBM has published product reviews covering software categories for every facet of the wine business: in the cellar, the vineyard, for direct sales, depletions, POS, accounting and more. These product reviews are a great resource and can be accessed online. The various trade channels, increasing complexity of software systems can be intimidating, though, so where do you start? We happen to have that one covered this month with a primer on the process of evaluating your needs and selecting the best options.
– Cyril Penn, Editor
Click here to subscribe to WBM.
Across the newsdesk this week from the Napa Valley Grapegrowers is an announcement about a significant number of regulatory changes have recently been made that affect Napa Valley Grapegrowers, Farm Labor Contractors (FLC) and Vineyard Management companies. The two most notable changes concern Piece-Rate wages and new signage requirements for Vineyard Management/FLC companies.
Changes have been made to the requirements for documenting and compensating your workers during breaks/non-productive times. Growers and vineyard managers need to ensure that itemized wage statements now contain a line item for non-productive work time and break periods, and the rate at which each is being paid is in compliance with Labor Code section 226.
Click here to for more details about Piece-Rate changes (Western Growers)
Vineyard Management companies and Farm Labor Contractors are now required to post signage at the entrance to each vineyard site where they have crews working or risk losing their FLC license. These new state licensing requirements supersede Napa County sign ordinances, and need to obtain the following information:
Top Portion of Signage:
Name of Licensee
FLC License Number
Bottom Portion of Signage:
Licensee’s Field Supervisor Name
Licensee’s Field Supervisor Working Phone Number
Signage should be at least 4 feet by 4 feet
Signage not obstructed by vehicles, other signs, trees, etc.
Use contracting colors for background and lettering
Sign can be staked to ground or fixed to fold-out frame (A Frame)
Bottom of sign at least 12 inches from ground
Placement of Signage
Placed initially within 30 feet
Clearly visible from access roads near site
Located where workers enter worksite during workday
Review a summary of all regulatory changes to FLC Licensing Requirements – IN ENGLISH or IN SPANISH. For more information or questions, please contact the NVG office at (707) 944-8311 or AgSafe at (209) 526-4400
This week’s trip by Cuban sommeliers through Napa and Sonoma continues and Tuesday’s adventure took them to dinner at Healdsburg’s Dry Creek Kitchen. The evening’s wines included a Cabernet Sauvignon from Parellel Napa Valley, a Russian Hill Estate Pinot Noir, and a Chadonnay from Rarecat Wines. Rounding out the evening was a wonderful 12-year-old brandy , Korbel 12, brought to go with the Cohiba cigars that the sommeliers offered guests.
Paula Kornell, representing Parallel Napa Valley, Ed Gomez, owner of Russian Hill Estates, Sharon Harris, owner of Rarecat Wines, and Korbel ‘s Executive Vice President, Margie Healy, spoke to the intimate group of wine industry professionals and media about their delight in sharing the fruits of their labor, their ideas, and their knowledge with the Cuban delegation, many of whom have never been to the United States before. Fernando Fernandez (pictured with translator)– an eminent Cuban professor, master sommelier and internationally-known expert in cigars and rum, spoke for the group and conveyed his appreciation to all who are involved in helping to make their journey meaningful.
Wednesday, they were off to the Fred MacMurray Ranch (named after the star of the “My Three Sons” 1960’s tv show) for a tour and tasting by MacMurray’s daughter, Kate.
“We have them going to as many wineries in both Sonoma and Napa, as we can,” said Steve Burns, marketing and event coordinator who helped organize the tour. "We are also bringing representatives from wineries in other counties here to meet them. We are learning a lot and having so much fun!"
Apparently lots of fun. On the return bus ride the driver decided to play the top ten Cuban songs and the sommeliers began to call out Bailar! Bailar—and everyone got up and danced!
Providing an opportunity for mutually beneficial exchanges between Americans and the Cuban people, the trip has been put together by Sonoma-based nonprofit Californians Building Bridges in partnership with the Napa Vintners Association and the Sonoma Vintners and Wine Institute—fantastico!
Tasting set up at MacMurray Ranch
The Cuban group taking photos in the vineyards at MacMurray Ranch
Pinot Noir going through Veraison at MacMurray Ranch
Veraison has started at Iron Horse Vineyards in Sebastopol, California:
With the latest drought in California in its third year, we're being barraged with headlines about water. It's enough to make one's eyes glaze over. There's seemingly several articles to read every day, from the effects on employment in the Central Valley, to debates on the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan and more.
The State Water Resources Control Board just adopted drought regulations giving local agencies the authority to fine water wasters up to $500 a day. One article quoted San Francisco officials saying they are concerned a ban on washing streets and sidewalks could put a damper on sending out city trucks to spray away the filth downtown.
Today's news even included Lady Gaga joining California’s water conservation campaign.
Well, beyond those headlines there's much more at work here, and it should concern all farmers, including the farmers that grow grapes for making wine. It's getting serious.
The next shoe to drop is groundwater.
California is the only western state that doesn’t already regulate groundwater.
Out in the Central Valley, where curtailments are in effect, the water situation has escalated to a point where many commodities are affected. Citrus trees are getting pulled out because of the lack of water on the west side of Fresno and into Tulare County. There are situations where grape vines are being minimally farmed in Fresno County, just being watered to be kept alive. Wells are going dry amid competition to get pump companies that are available on a timely basis. Some farmers will go broke. There are reports that some vines are damaged, with growth delayed because they didn’t get enough water last season. Nevertheless, the jury is still out on what the cumulative effect will be for the short- and long-term.
California is pumping more water from the ground than is being recharged. This situation is called overdraft and it isn't sustainable. Some sub-districts in particular are not recovering annually. That's not new news, though. I'm reminded of an article we published in WBM way back in 2008, "The End of Cheap, Plentiful Water.”
As one might imagine, agricultural interests are watching these lastest developments – particularly the potential expansion of the water board’s authority – very closely. Many are concerned about the state’s intentions on groundwater legislation because groundwater use is tantamount to a property right.
The California Wine Institute does not take a specific position on groundwater management, though informally supports the concept of local affected parties managing their own groundwater – along the broad philosophical lines of what has been proposed for Paso Robles.
The California Association of Winegrape Growers will consider a detailed position on groundwater regulation – a set of policy principles - at a board meeting next week.
I asked CAWG President Jon Aguirre, "Is groundwater regulation in California inevitable?"
“I think it’s inevitable that there will be a different regulatory climate,” he replied.
via Free The Grapes!
· May 16, 2005: The U.S. Supreme Court rules in Granholm v. Heald that Michigan’s and New York’s discriminatory bans on interstate wine shipments are unconstitutional. MA has a similar regulatory arrangement.
· November 21, 2005: Governor Mitt Romney vetoes MA House Bill 4498, which prohibits winery-to-consumer shipping if the winery has been represented by a Massachusetts wholesaler within the last six months, or if the winery produces more than 30,000 gallons of wine a year.
· Spring 2006: The veto on HB 4498 is overridden and becomes state law.
· September 18, 2006: Family Winemakers of California vs. Jenkins is filed, stating that current Massachusetts law violates the nondiscrimination principle of the Commerce Clause.
· November 19, 2008: Judge Rya Zobel rules in favor of Family Winemakers of California vs. Jenkins, and later, enjoins the state from enforcing the law on December 18, 2008.
· January 14, 2010: The 1st Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upholds Judge Rya Zobel’s ruling.
· 2011-2012: House Bill 1029 is introduced to reconcile the current statute and Judge Zobel’s ruling, but dies in committee in 2012.
· January 18, 2013: House Bill 294, authored by Rep. Theodore (Ted) C. Speliotis, is introduced to allow wine direct shipping.
· March 21, 2013: Former New England Patriots quarterback, and now Washington vintner, Drew Bledsoe, blitzes Boston in support of wine direct shipping.
· June 30, 2014: House and Senate sign conference committee’s budget to Governor, including language similar to HB 294.
Winejobs.com released a report detailing wine job posting trends as of June 2014. As the wine industry’s leading online job site, Winejobs.com has a unique vantage point over industry trends. The Winejobs.com index indicates that job postings increased 34 percent from June 2013. The index is up 17 percent so far this year.
The June increase in job postings was driven by winemaking and tasting room/hospitality jobs. The winemaking job index rose 41 percent from its level in June 2013, and is up 28 percent year-to-date.
The hospitality index increased 57 percent from its level in June 2013, and is up 20 percent for the year.
The sales and marketing index decreased 18 percent from its level in June 2013, and is flat year-to-date.